Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
Hands holding long strong Minor
suits are difficult to exploit profitably.
One needs eleven tricks for game in the suit. At duplicate pairs, however, even success is
likely to produce a worse score than would 3NT.
Then there is the question of the opening bid. At which level should one
start? Should one be “natural”, or
artificial? There are almost as many
approaches as there are systems. Nevertheless,
what many of them have in common is that the partnership arrives at a bid, or
rebid, by opener at the three level in a six-card
almost-solid Minor suit, based on a hand holding around 8 playing tricks. What
then?
Terence Reese analysed this
situation over 30 years ago, suggesting various possible combinations of ideas taken
from World Champion teams. A scheme that
emerges is in two parts, the simpler part when one is seeking to play in
3NT. It is summarised best by the adage
“Don’t Ask, Don’t tell”: the responder doesn’t ask, opener doesn’t tell. To be more specific, and approach it from the
positive viewpoint, the partner of the long-suited hand tells of stops, the long-suited opener asks for stops. Hence, if starting
from an artificial sequence (Benjamin, or the Multi-2D, say) one reaches the
bid 3C, by opener, the responder
then tells by bidding:
3D: I hold a Diamond stop, and perhaps others.
3H: I hold a Heart stop, perhaps a Spade stop, but
not a Diamond stop.
3S: I hold a Spade stop, but neither a Diamond nor
a Heart stop.
3NT:
I hold a high Club honour, (A, K, or Q) but
no outside stops.
The
opener can then decide on 3NT, or knowing it is dangerous, with a suit open,
revert to the Minor suit. If in doubt, and there is room, opener can bid an
intervening suit at the three level, asking
responder if a stop is held there too.
Responder would then bid 3NT
with that suit stopped.
Over a long-suited Diamond hand, the
situation is more cramped but similar:
3H:
I hold a Heart stop, and perhaps other stops.
3S:
I hold a Spade stop, but no Heart stop.
3NT:
I hold no Major stop, but either a Club stop,
or a
high Diamond Honour, or both.
The above scheme covers most possibilities, and the concept
is relatively simple. Responder may also
pass the 3-level Minor, with a blank
hand.
With a strong hand, itself perhaps worth an opening bid,
there may well be a slam contract to consider.
Holding a balanced hand, the first response is as above, your lowest
stop. If that response would have been 3NT, then it becomes 4NT quantitatively, showing an estimated
4 additional playing tricks. Similarly,
if opener “asks”, after your first “tell”, and your
response could be 3NT, you bid 4NT instead. Should you hold a more distributional powerful
hand as responder, however, and you are interested in a slam contract in a
different suit, bid your lowest stopped suit at the three level, as requested,
then rebid your long suit at the four level. If interested in a game, but not a slam, bid
game directly in that suit.
The responses of 4C and
4D are conventional. 4C asks
for opener’s lower Major support. 4D asks for opener’s lowest Ace. These examples may help:
S K J x
H A Q J 10 x x x
D x x
C x
[2C
– 2D (Benjamin)] – 3C – 4H!
Your
suit is strong enough to play in game at the 4 level, but you are unlikely to
have slam prospects.
S A K Q J x x opposite S x x
H A x H K J x
D x x D A K Q J x x
C K x x C A x
2C – 2D – 3D – 3H(telling)
– 3S(asking) – 4S! – 5C(cue bid) – 6NT(or 7NT!)
With
a powerful solid 6+-card suit, and slam aspirations, you have bid your lowest
stopped other suit, (Ace or King plus, in this context), then over partner’s asking
rebid, you have bid your long suit at the 4-level.
4C
asks for opener’s lower 3+-card Major (or failing that, a doubleton with one or
more of the top three honours). Denial
is 4D. One may then bid a 6-card Major suggesting
that partner choose either to pass, or go to game in the long Minor with only a
singleton in the Major, or even try 4NT
to play!
S A Q 10 x x x opposite S
x
H x x x H A x x
D K x D A x x
C x x C A K Q J x x
2C – 2D – 3C - 4C? – 4H – 4S – 4NT (to play)
or S A K x x x opposite S
x x x
H K Q x x x H J x
D x D A K Q 10 x x
C x x C A K x
2C – 2D – 3D - 4C – 4S.
whereas
S - opposite S
K Q x
H A K x x H x x
D K Q J x x x D A x
C Q x x C A K J 10 x x x
2C – 2D – 3C – 4D? – 4NT – 7C or 7D!
4D asked for
opener’s nearest Ace upwards (4NT
shows AD).
To
conclude I quote Mr Reese:
“In
proportion to their frequency these situations receive rather complicated
treatment. But you know how it is – if you leave a sequence in the air it crops
up in an important match just when you can’t afford a game swing.”
Think
on these things.
copyright © David King 2004