Just a Puppet on a Strong
Transfer
bids were designed originally to try to ensure that the strong one-no-trump
bidder became declarer. It would seem
logical therefore for players to use transfer sequences over the opening bid of
2NT, or its various equivalents, such as 2C - 2D – 2NT. Even if partnerships do bid this way, they
still have to assign a meaning to the bid of 3C. Is it Stayman, or
Baron? Those are the most common options
in the
There
are two styles. The original, I believe,
used 3C as a transfer bid too, to 3D.
That response can be passed! So one immediately gains a new weakness
takeout option. Assuming, however, that
the 3C bidder is really interested in the Major suits, then responder now bids the major in which he or she does not
hold 4 cards. This is effectively a
transfer bid too, but instead of to the next suit up, it is to the other
Major. Of course, if the 2NT bidder does
not hold four cards in that other Major, then 3NT becomes the contract. Should responder be fortunate enough to hold both Majors then after the 3D obligatory
rebid, 3NT is called.
The 2NT opener now selects a Major, or passes.
The
other style is much more akin to “modified Baron”, familiar already to many
S K 10 x x
H Q x
D x x x
C x x x x
S x S x x x x
H x x x H J 10 x x
D A x x x D Q J 10
C K Q J 10 x C
x x
S A Q J x
H A K x x
D K x x
C A x
Playing
standard Stayman, or Baron, or even modified Baron,
the contract is liable to be 4S, by North one down, after the obvious Diamond lead. 3NT is defeated too, on a Club lead. The
puppet masters, however, using either style above, could bid:
S
N S N S
N
2NT - 3C
- 3D -
3H! - 3S -
4S end.
South is now declarer and a losing Diamond disappears on a Heart.
The contract makes on what is effectively a cross ruff. There is no need to draw trumps.
copyright © David King 2004